Onsite Case Study —
Saluja Contracts
Building contractors give site supervisors authority to spend on day-to-day site requirements. Petty materials, consumables, fuel, and small items that keep the site moving between formal purchase orders flow through supervisors as cash advances against verbal authorizations. The value of this flexibility is real. The cost of having no visibility into how that flexibility is being used accumulates in ways that only become visible at month-end reconciliation.
Site progress runs on a parallel channel. Updates from multiple active projects arrive through phone calls and WhatsApp messages at different times, in different formats, and with no structured way to compare one site’s position against another or against the planned schedule. The project manager who wants to know the current state of four active Delhi building sites has to make four calls and assemble four inconsistent answers into one picture that is already outdated by the time it is ready.
For Amardeep Saluja and the Saluja Contracts team, these two problems operated simultaneously across every active project. Petty expenses were leaving through supervisors with no real-time record of how much, for what, or at which site. Progress was arriving through calls in formats that could not be compared or tracked against milestones. With over 24 years of building construction experience across Delhi NCR, the company had the operational expertise to build well. What it lacked was the visibility to manage costs and progress in real time during execution, not after.
Supervisors at active Saluja Contracts building sites handled day-to-day spending through cash advances with no connected system recording what was spent, on what, at which site, and by which supervisor. The expense position across all active sites was unknown until monthly reconciliation. By that point, the money had already been committed and overspending had accumulated over weeks before Amardeep Saluja could see it. There was no mechanism to identify when a supervisor’s spending at a specific site was running above what the current progress justified.
With multiple supervisors across multiple active Delhi building sites, there was no dashboard showing how much had been advanced to each supervisor and how they were spending it at their site. Getting this picture required calling each supervisor for a verbal account of their spending. The picture assembled from those calls was based on what supervisors recalled and reported rather than on verified recorded entries, and it was outdated by the time the last call was made.
Progress updates from active building projects in Delhi NCR arrived through phone calls and WhatsApp messages at different times from different sites in formats that differed from each other and could not be tracked against a planned schedule. Seeing the current progress position across all active projects required a round of individual calls producing inconsistent answers. No structured record existed of what each site had completed or how it compared to what was planned for that stage of the project.
Even if a snapshot of expenses and a snapshot of progress could each be assembled from their respective scattered sources, they arrived at different times, in different formats, and with no shared reference that would allow the two pictures to be compared. Amardeep Saluja had no mechanism to see whether the money a supervisor was spending at a specific site matched what that site was actually achieving. The connection between site spending and site progress that makes construction cost management meaningful did not exist.
| What was broken | What Onsite replaced it with |
|---|---|
| Supervisor petty expenses invisible until month-end reconciliation | Every petty expense recorded at time of spending with amount, purpose, site, and supervisor |
| No dashboard showing how much each supervisor received and spent | Complete visibility into every supervisor’s expense position per site from one dashboard |
| Site progress arriving through calls in inconsistent formats with no structured record | Daily progress recorded against specific activities through mobile app. Structured and dated |
| Expenses and progress disconnected with no way to compare spending against achievement | Petty expenses and site progress visible together from one screen for connected oversight |
Saluja Contracts now has complete information about what amount is paid to each supervisor and how they are spending at every active building site in Delhi from one connected platform. Petty expenses that previously accumulated invisibly between monthly reconciliations are now visible as supervisors record them. Site progress across all active projects is visible from one structured dashboard.
The combination gives Amardeep Saluja a complete operational and financial picture of every active project from one screen. When spending at a specific site outpaces the progress being made there, the mismatch is visible during execution while adjustment is still possible, not at month-end when the decision window has closed.
As Amardeep Saluja puts it:
| Area | Before Onsite | After Onsite |
|---|---|---|
| Supervisor petty expenses | Invisible until month-end reconciliation | Visible in real time per supervisor per site |
| Expense accountability | Verbal accounts from supervisors on request | Recorded entries in Onsite with amount, purpose, site |
| Site progress visibility | Phone calls and WhatsApp in inconsistent formats | Structured daily entries from one dashboard |
| Cross-site overview | Round of individual supervisor calls | Live from one platform at any point |
| Expense control timing | After money already spent and committed | During execution while adjustment is still possible |
| Spending vs progress | No connected view of both together | Both visible on one screen for connected oversight |
Saluja Contracts has delivered residential homes, commercial buildings, schools, colleges, and factory construction across Delhi NCR for over 24 years, building client relationships on quality craftsmanship, transparent communication, and timely delivery.
Every petty expense is recorded by the responsible supervisor at the time of spending. No invisible accumulation between monthly reconciliations. Amardeep Saluja sees the current expense position per supervisor per site at any point during execution.
Petty expense visibility and site progress tracking are available from one Onsite dashboard simultaneously. Amardeep Saluja sees what each supervisor is spending and what each site is achieving from one connected view without calling anyone.
Before Onsite, petty site expenses paid to supervisors were invisible until monthly reconciliation. The money had already been committed and spent by the time the management team could see how much had gone out, to whom, and at which site. Any overspending was discovered after the fact, with no opportunity to adjust during the phase where costs accumulated. After Onsite, every petty expense is recorded in real time as the supervisor spends it. When spending at a specific site runs above what current progress justifies, the gap is visible immediately while procurement decisions and authorization levels can still be adjusted. Expense control became a live management capability rather than a retrospective review.
Amardeep Saluja has complete information about what amount is paid to each supervisor and how they are spending at every active building site in Delhi. No verbal accounts. No estimation. Every supervisor’s expense position is backed by recorded entries in Onsite.
During execution.
If your construction company pays supervisors cash advances with no real-time visibility into how that money is being spent, and tracks site progress through phone call updates in inconsistent formats, Onsite gives you complete supervisor expense visibility and structured site progress tracking from one platform.